
Lionsgate has got a real cash cow on its hands. No, I'm not talking about Tyler Perry, though he's
earned the studio a pretty penny with his movies in recent years. I mean the Saw films. For no apparent reason
other than the fact that they roll out at Halloween, the movies have become a staggering financial success. Despite
growing arguably worse with each passing movie, they continue to rake in the money, severed hand over
bloody fist. With Saw IV coming out right on cue next weekend, the question isn't how bad it's
going to be, but how much money it's going to rake in anyway.
While the first movie was somewhat clever and original (a quality I value in any movie), many
would argue that the Saw films started going downhill fast when the second movie rolled out (CB's Rafe Telsch disagrees, but I
think he has a thing for Dina Meyer). Some say the third movie was where things turned sour, but people
still turned out in droves to see it. At this point pretty much everyone (even horror fans) seem to have the
lowest of expectations for Saw IV, but if history is any indication, the promise of a lousy movie isn't likely to keep audiences
away.
Of course no one expects these movies to be works of art. They're horror movies. You don't go see
them for the witty dialogue or brilliant acting. You to see them to watch people doing stupid, scary
things in the hopes that you will be scared yourself. Still, at some point the stupid outweighs the
scary and the franchise becomes a complete waste of time. It happened to all the greats: Nightmare On
Elm Street, Friday the 13th and so on. Somewhere along the way the franchise goes from the
good kind of bad to the bad kind of bad. And yet, even if you walked out of Saw II swearing you'd
never spend another dime on those crappy Saw sequels, people can't seem to help themselves ( you're in good
company, though, with CB's Mack Rawden).
Each movie has made more cash than the one before it. And since they're made on shoestring
budgets they turn wild profits, almost guaranteeing that we'll be seeing Jigsaw in theaters for many
Halloweens to come. Though the movies get progressively worse, more and more people go to see them. And
it's not just in the U.S. It's a phenomenon that spans the globe. There's no denying it. The numbers
don't lie. I've laid them out for you below. Behold them, one of the greatest mysteries of our time.
Saw
Released:
October, 2004
Budget:
$1.2 million
World-wide Box Office:
$103 million
Cinema Blend Review:
"Saw is not for everyone. It can be gruesome and brutal, if that’s your thing, but that makes up a
very small part of what it otherwise an interesting psychological thriller. It’s not perfect; with a
little less hamming from some of the leads and a little script tweaking it could have been an excellent
movie."
Cinema Blend DVD Review:
"Saw was made on a micro budget, raked
in millions at the box office, and is doing the same in DVD sales. The movie’s success can partly be
credited to a rise in horror movie popularity as well as a clever publicity campaign. The enigmatic and
ubiquitous posters for this movie made many people take notice, including me. Does Saw deserve all the
attention it’s getting?"
Saw II
Released:
October, 2005
Budget:
$4 million
World-wide Box Office:
$147 million
Cinema Blend Review:
With a stronger story, sicker and more
disturbing traps, and even better acting then the original, Saw II is one of those rare sequels that
surpass the foundation it was built on. While the movie does, yet again, leave things open for a potential
sequel, I hope Lion’s Gate won’t resort to pulling another chapter out. They’ve gotten the Saw concept
right this time. There’s no need to delve further and possibly steer the franchise in the wrong
direction."
Saw III
Released:
October, 2006
Budget:
$10 million
World-wide Box Office:
$164 million
Cinema Blend Review:
"Like a home video recorded by a five
year-old who doesn’t know how to work the zoom, Saw III spins through its list of disemboweling traps with
little concern for continuity or common sense."
Cinema Blend DVD Review:
"Saw III is packed with
stock footage from the previous two Saws to the point where it seems less like an actual movie and more
like a mad mix tape. The Bloody Best of Saw!Of course, most of what is shown is pointless filler."
http://www.cinemablend.com/new/Box-Office-Oddity-The-Saw-Factor-6718.html